Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Burnett v. City of Rome

Burnett v. City of Rome

67 S.E. 833, 7 Ga. App. 640, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 439
Court of Appeals of Georgia·Decided April 19, 1910·No. 2203·Published

Opinion

Hnm, C. J.

Tlie allegations of the plaintiff’s petition fail to set out a cause of action, and the lower court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed. Russell, J., dissents.

Bubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff, cited Dempsey v. Borne, 94 Ga. 420. W. J. Nunnally, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burnett v. City of Rome, 67 S.E. 833, 7 Ga. App. 640, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 439 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

67 S.E. 833 (Burnett v. City of Rome) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dempsey v. City of Rome
20 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)