Home/Court of Appeals of Georgia/Burnett v. City of Rome

Burnett v. City of Rome

67 S.E. 833, 7 Ga. App. 640, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 439
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedApril 19, 1910
Docket2203
StatusPublished

This text of 67 S.E. 833 (Burnett v. City of Rome) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burnett v. City of Rome, 67 S.E. 833, 7 Ga. App. 640, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 439 (Ga. Ct. App. 1910).

Opinion

Hnm, C. J.

Tlie allegations of the plaintiff’s petition fail to set out a cause of action, and the lower court did not err in sustaining a general demurrer and dismissing the petition.

Judgment affirmed. Russell, J., dissents.

Bubanks & Mebane, for plaintiff, cited Dempsey v. Borne, 94 Ga. 420. W. J. Nunnally, for defendant.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Dempsey v. City of Rome
20 S.E. 335 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1894)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
67 S.E. 833, 7 Ga. App. 640, 1910 Ga. App. LEXIS 439, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-city-of-rome-gactapp-1910.