Burnett v. Axford

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Burnett v. Axford

136 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 392, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239

DecidedMarch 17, 1927

StatusPublished

This text of 136 A. 925 (Burnett v. Axford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burnett v. Axford, 136 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 392, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239 (N.J. 1927).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Application for a permit to erect a one-story brick building as a warehouse on lots 19 and 19%, block 158, city map of Bayonne, was made by relator and refused by the building inspector on the ground that protests had been filed against the issuance thereof pursuant to the provisions of section 1 of the amendment to the building code. After such refusal an appeal was taken to the city commissioners under the terms of the building code upon the ground that there were protests against the issuance of the permit.

All the questions raised here by respondents were raised and disposed of by this court adversely to them in Songer Realty Corp. v. Axford et al., 5 N. J. Mis. R. 220.

Relator is therefore entitled to a peremptory writ of • mandamus.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Application for a permit to erect a one-story brick building as a warehouse on lots 19 and 19%, block 158, city map of Bayonne, was made by relator and refused by the building inspector on the ground that protests had been filed against the issuance thereof pursuant to the provisions of section 1 of the amendment to the building code. After such refusal an appeal was taken to the city commissioners under the terms of the building code upon the ground that there were protests against the issuance of the permit.

All the questions raised here by respondents were raised and disposed of by this court adversely to them in Songer Realty Corp. v. Axford et al., 5 N. J. Mis. R. 220.

Relator is therefore entitled to a peremptory writ of • mandamus.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 A. 925, 5 N.J. Misc. 392, 1927 N.J. Sup. Ct. LEXIS 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnett-v-axford-nj-1927.