Burnet v. Israel
This text of 39 S.E. 372 (Burnet v. Israel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
In this controversy, without action in the original jurisdiction of this Court, the plaintiff seeks to enjoin the defendants, claiming to act as county board of commissioners of Charleston County, from auditing, -approving or preparing to pay claims against the county of Charleston, on the ground that the defendants are not "a legally constituted board. Having in the case of the Carolina Grocery Co. v. Barnwell R. Burnet, county treasurer, just filed, determined that the said -county board of commissioners is legally constituted, for the reasons therein stated, this is controlled thereby.
It is, therefore, ordered and adjudged, that the petition for injunction be dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
39 S.E. 372, 61 S.C. 215, 1901 S.C. LEXIS 187, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnet-v-israel-sc-1901.