Burner v. Commissioner of Social Security
This text of 592 F. App'x 208 (Burner v. Commissioner of Social Security) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
Casey Lynn Burner (Burner) appeals from the district court’s order adopting the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation recommending the district court grant summary judgment in favor of the Commissioner of Social Security with respect to Burner’s challenge to the denial of her application for childhood supplemental security income benefits under Subchapter XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1381-1385. After reviewing the briefs and the record on appeal, we conclude there is no reversible error in the district court’s decision. Thus, we affirm on the reasoning of the magistrate judge, as adopted by the district court. Burner v. Commissioner, No. 2:13-cv-00028, 2014 WL 1479201 (ND.W.Va. Apr. 15, 2014).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
592 F. App'x 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burner-v-commissioner-of-social-security-ca4-2015.