Burnau v. Whitten

Supreme Court of Missouri

Burnau v. Whitten

642 S.W.2d 346, 1982 Mo. LEXIS 417

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedDecember 3, 1982

DocketNo. 64015

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 642 S.W.2d 346 (Burnau v. Whitten) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burnau v. Whitten, 642 S.W.2d 346, 1982 Mo. LEXIS 417 (Mo. 1982).

Pincite

Opinion

HIGGINS, Judge.

Leo and Agnes Burnau sought temporary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting enforcement of section 320.150 RSMo 1978, and money damages for injuries sustained as a result of the statute’s enforcement. The trial court dismissed the petition. In the Court of Appeals, Southern District, they contended the trial court erred in not granting injunctive relief because there was a clear showing plaintiff would sustain irreparable harm as a result of his inability to sell fireworks; plaintiff was subject to multiple litigation without such relief; section 320.150 RSMo was unconstitutionally vague; and injunctive relief was the proper remedy preventing enforcement of an unconstitutional statute. They did not assign error to the dismissal of their damage action. The case was transferred to this Court because it involves construction of a statute of this state. The question is whether section 320.150 is constitutional. Affirmed.

Generally, courts of equity are without jurisdiction to enjoin enforcement of criminal statutes. State ex rel. Eagleton v. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d 449, 453 (Mo. banc 1964); Wellston Kennel Club v. Castlen, 331 Mo. 798, 804, 55 S.W.2d 288, 289 (1932). When the criminal law in question is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid and attempted enforcement would directly invade a property right causing irreparable injury, equity will enjoin enforcement of the offending statute. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d at 453. In order that this exception apply, the elements of statutory invalidity and irreparable injury must clearly appear. Id. at 453-54; Wellston Kennel Club, 331 Mo. at 804, 55 S.W.2d at 289; Browning v. City of Poplar Bluff, 370 S.W.2d 179, 183 (Mo.App.1963). Appellants’ challenge to the constitutionality of section 320.150 was considered in State v. Burnau, 642 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. banc 1982), and this Court held section 320.150 constitutional.

Appellant has failed to establish an exception to the general rule prohibiting equitable interference with criminal stat[347]*347utes. The trial court was without jurisdiction to enjoin the statute and properly dismissed the petition for such relief.

The judgment is affirmed.

DONNELLY, C.J., RENDLEN, SEILER, WELLIVER, and GUNN, JJ., and FINCH, Senior Judge, concur. BILLINGS, J., not sitting.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HIGGINS, Judge.

Leo and Agnes Burnau sought temporary and permanent injunctive relief prohibiting enforcement of section 320.150 RSMo 1978, and money damages for injuries sustained as a result of the statute’s enforcement. The trial court dismissed the petition. In the Court of Appeals, Southern District, they contended the trial court erred in not granting injunctive relief because there was a clear showing plaintiff would sustain irreparable harm as a result of his inability to sell fireworks; plaintiff was subject to multiple litigation without such relief; section 320.150 RSMo was unconstitutionally vague; and injunctive relief was the proper remedy preventing enforcement of an unconstitutional statute. They did not assign error to the dismissal of their damage action. The case was transferred to this Court because it involves construction of a statute of this state. The question is whether section 320.150 is constitutional. Affirmed.

Generally, courts of equity are without jurisdiction to enjoin enforcement of criminal statutes. State ex rel. Eagleton v. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d 449, 453 (Mo. banc 1964); Wellston Kennel Club v. Castlen, 331 Mo. 798, 804, 55 S.W.2d 288, 289 (1932). When the criminal law in question is unconstitutional or otherwise invalid and attempted enforcement would directly invade a property right causing irreparable injury, equity will enjoin enforcement of the offending statute. McQueen, 378 S.W.2d at 453. In order that this exception apply, the elements of statutory invalidity and irreparable injury must clearly appear. Id. at 453-54; Wellston Kennel Club, 331 Mo. at 804, 55 S.W.2d at 289; Browning v. City of Poplar Bluff, 370 S.W.2d 179, 183 (Mo.App.1963). Appellants’ challenge to the constitutionality of section 320.150 was considered in State v. Burnau, 642 S.W.2d 621 (Mo. banc 1982), and this Court held section 320.150 constitutional.

Appellant has failed to establish an exception to the general rule prohibiting equitable interference with criminal stat[347]*347utes. The trial court was without jurisdiction to enjoin the statute and properly dismissed the petition for such relief.

The judgment is affirmed.

DONNELLY, C.J., RENDLEN, SEILER, WELLIVER, and GUNN, JJ., and FINCH, Senior Judge, concur. BILLINGS, J., not sitting.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

642 S.W.2d 346, 1982 Mo. LEXIS 417, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burnau-v-whitten-mo-1982.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack