Burman v. Elder
341 S.W.2d 776
This text of 341 S.W.2d 776 (Burman v. Elder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Kentucky primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burman v. Elder, 341 S.W.2d 776 (Ky. Ct. App. 1960).
Opinion
Motion for an appeal from a $729 judgment on a note. A judgment was directed for the plaintiff on the ground that defendant had no provable defense.
The judgment must be affirmed on the authority of Pickrell v. Wilson, 199 Ky. 20, 250 S.W. 135, and Eigelbach v. Roppel, 263 Ky. 604, 92 S.W.2d 764.
The motion for appeal is denied and the judgment stands affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Eigelbach v. Roppel
92 S.W.2d 764 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976), 1936)
Pickrell v. Wilson
250 S.W. 135 (Court of Appeals of Kentucky, 1923)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
341 S.W.2d 776, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burman-v-elder-kyctapp-1960.