Burlison v. Lomas Mortgage, USA, Inc.
886 S.W.2d 216, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702
Opinion
ORDER
Defendant appeals from an order denying its motion to set aside a default judgment. We affirm. No error of law appears and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burlison v. Lomas Mortgage, USA, Inc., 886 S.W.2d 216, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 1702 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
886 S.W.2d 216 (Burlison v. Lomas Mortgage, USA, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.