Burlington Voluntary Relief Department of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. White

59 N.W. 751, 41 Neb. 561, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 183
Nebraska Supreme Court·Decided June 26, 1894·No. No. 5356·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Irvine, C.

This case is based upon the same state of facts as that of Burlington Voluntary Relief Department v. White, 41 Neb., 547, just decided. Here Mrs. White, as administratrix, sues to recover the disability benefits which accrued to White before his death. The trials were separate, and there are some differences in the evidence and in the instructions, but none of them is material. The cases were submitted upon the same briefs, and it is recognized by the parties that upon the principal questions involved the same considerations must control both cases.

Upon an examination of rules 54 and 55 of the associa- ' tion it is perhaps doubtful whether, in the case of the death of a member at a time when disability benefits have accrued, those benefits do not become consolidated with the death benefit and payable to his beneficiary rather than to his personal representative. We do not understand, however, that counsel contend for this construction, nor do we find that the question is raised by the record.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burlington Voluntary Relief Department of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. White, 59 N.W. 751, 41 Neb. 561, 1894 Neb. LEXIS 183 (Neb. 1894).

59 N.W. 751 (Burlington Voluntary Relief Department of the Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. White) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Huffman v. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen
259 N.W. 663 (North Dakota Supreme Court, 1935)
Supreme Lodge of the Order of Select Friends v. Raymond
49 L.R.A. 373 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1897)