Burlington Distilling Co. v. State Board of Assessors
93 A. 1084, 87 N.J.L. 315, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 216
Opinion
The judgment under review herein should be affirmed for the reasons expressed in the opinion delivered by Mr. Justice Minturn in the Supreme Court.
[316] For affirmance—The Chancellor, Bergen, Kalisch, Black, White, Terhune, Williams, JJ. 7.
For reversal—The Chief Justice, Swayze, Parker, Bogert, Yredenburgh, Heppenheimer, JJ. 6.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burlington Distilling Co. v. State Board of Assessors, 93 A. 1084, 87 N.J.L. 315, 1915 N.J. LEXIS 216 (N.J. 1915).
93 A. 1084 (Burlington Distilling Co. v. State Board of Assessors) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New Jersey State League of Municipalities v. Kimmelman
522 A.2d 430 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1987)
General Electric Co. v. City of Passaic
147 A.2d 233 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1958)