Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc. v. Evangelina Garcia

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas
DecidedMay 25, 2006
Docket13-02-00651-CV
StatusPublished

This text of Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc. v. Evangelina Garcia (Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc. v. Evangelina Garcia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc. v. Evangelina Garcia, (Tex. Ct. App. 2006).

Opinion

                             NUMBER 13-02-651-CV

                         COURT OF APPEALS

               THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

                  CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG

___________________________________________________________________

BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY

WAREHOUSE OF McALLEN, INC.,                               Appellant,

                                           v.

EVANGELINA GARCIA,                                               Appellee.

___________________________________________________________________

                On appeal from County Court at Law No. 1

                           of Hidalgo County, Texas.

___________________________________________________________________

                     MEMORANDUM OPINION

               Before Justices Rodriguez, Castillo, and Garza

Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam


Appellant, BURLINGTON COAT FACTORY WAREHOUSE OF McALLEN, INC., perfected an appeal from a judgment entered by County Court at Law No. 1 of Hidalgo County, Texas, in cause number CL-40,241-B.  After the record and briefs were filed and after the appeal was abated pending decision from the Texas Supreme Court,  appellant filed a motion to dismiss the appeal.  In the motion, appellant states that the appeal is now moot.  Appellant requests that this Court dismiss the appeal.

The Court, having considered the documents on file and appellant=s motion to dismiss the appeal, is of the opinion that the motion should be granted.  Appellant=s motion to dismiss is granted, and the appeal is hereby DISMISSED.

PER CURIAM

Memorandum Opinion delivered and

filed this the 25th day of May, 2006.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Burlington Coat Factory Warehouse of McAllen, Inc. v. Evangelina Garcia, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burlington-coat-factory-warehouse-of-mcallen-inc-v-texapp-2006.