Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame

2012 Ohio 5698, 983 N.E.2d 1252, 134 Ohio St. 3d 490
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 6, 2012
Docket2011-0742
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 2012 Ohio 5698 (Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame, 2012 Ohio 5698, 983 N.E.2d 1252, 134 Ohio St. 3d 490 (Ohio 2012).

Opinion

{¶ 1} Sua sponte, the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of Anderson v. Massillon, 134 Ohio St.3d 380, 2012-Ohio-5711, 983 N.E.2d 266, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for further proceedings consistent with this court’s opinion in Anderson v. Massillon.

O’Connor, C.J., and Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, Cupp, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Pfeifer, J., dissents and would affirm the judgment of the court of appeals. *491 Landskroner, Grieco & Merriman, L.L.C., and Drew Legando, urging affirmance for amicus curiae Ohio Association for Justice. Murray & Murray Co., L.P.A., and John T. Murray, urging affirmance for amici curiae John Huffman and Olivia Duty.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Burlingame v. Estate of Burlingame
2014 Ohio 5440 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2014)
State v. Billman
2013 Ohio 5774 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
Toros v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Dev. Disabilities
2013 Ohio 4601 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2012 Ohio 5698, 983 N.E.2d 1252, 134 Ohio St. 3d 490, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burlingame-v-estate-of-burlingame-ohio-2012.