Burlingame v. . Dykeman

88 N.E. 1116, 194 N.Y. 583, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1423
New York Court of Appeals·Decided February 9, 1909·Published

Opinion

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burlingame v. . Dykeman, 88 N.E. 1116, 194 N.Y. 583, 1909 N.Y. LEXIS 1423 (N.Y. 1909).

88 N.E. 1116 (Burlingame v. . Dykeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.