Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.

797 N.W.2d 723, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 2139908

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedMay 25, 2011

DocketNo. A11-286

StatusPublished

This text of 797 N.W.2d 723 (Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc., 797 N.W.2d 723, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 2139908 (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).

Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.

BY THE COURT:

/s/Lorie S. Gildea Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI