Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.
797 N.W.2d 723, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 2139908
Opinion
ORDER
Based upon all the files, records and proceedings herein,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals filed February 2, 2011, be, and the same is, affirmed without opinion. See Hoff v. Kempton, 317 N.W.2d 361, 366 (Minn.1982) (explaining that [s]ummary affirmances have no prece-dential value because they do not commit the court to any particular point of view, doing no more than establishing the law of the case).
Employee is awarded $1,200 in attorney fees.
BY THE COURT:
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc., 797 N.W.2d 723, 2011 Minn. LEXIS 278, 2011 WL 2139908 (Mich. 2011).
797 N.W.2d 723 (Burlingame v. Becker Bros., Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hoff v. Kempton
317 N.W.2d 361 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1982)