Burleson v. State
This text of 819 S.W.2d 537 (Burleson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW
Appellant was convicted for the offense of aggravated sexual assault. See V.T.C.A., Penal Code, Section 22.021(a)(5). The Austin Court of Appeals affirmed appellant’s conviction. Burleson v. State, 791 S.W.2d 334 (Tex.App. — Austin 1990). This Court granted appellant’s petition for discretionary review to determine whether testimony admitted at trial pursuant to Article 38.071, Sections 2 and 3, V.A.C.C.P., constituted harmless error.
We now find that our decision to grant appellant’s petition was improvidently made. See Tex.R.App.P. 202(k). Accordingly, appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.1
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
819 S.W.2d 537, 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 222, 1991 WL 213148, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burleson-v-state-texcrimapp-1991.