Burleson v. State

102 S.W.2d 1063, 132 Tex. Crim. 89, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedJanuary 13, 1937
DocketNo. 18687
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 102 S.W.2d 1063 (Burleson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burleson v. State, 102 S.W.2d 1063, 132 Tex. Crim. 89, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123 (Tex. 1937).

Opinions

CHRISTIAN, Judge.

— The offense is driving an automobile on a public highway while intoxicated; the punishment, a fine of two hundred dollars and confinement in jail for thirty days.

The caption fails to show the date of the adjournment of the trial court. Under the decisions, this defect requires the dismissal of the-appeal. Miller v. State, 86 S. W. (2d) 460.

No sentence appears in the record. The offense of which appellant was convicted being a felony, it was the duty of the trial court to pronounce sentence upon the judgment of conviction. Under the decisions, an offense is a felony which is punishable by confinement in the penitentiary, even though it also carries, as an alternative punishment, a fine or imprisonment in the county jail. McCloud v. State, 60 S. W. (2d) 237. In the absence of a sentence this court is without jurisdiction. McCloud v. State, supra.

The appeal is dismissed.

The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Thomas v. State
148 S.W.2d 1109 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1941)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
102 S.W.2d 1063, 132 Tex. Crim. 89, 1937 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 123, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burleson-v-state-texcrimapp-1937.