Burleson v. State

288 S.W. 198, 105 Tex. Crim. 347, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 539
CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 10, 1926
DocketNo. 10393.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 288 S.W. 198 (Burleson v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burleson v. State, 288 S.W. 198, 105 Tex. Crim. 347, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 539 (Tex. 1926).

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts was not filed until 127 days after notice of appeal was given. No reason appears why it was not filed within the time required by the statute. It cannot be considered. Art. 760, C. C. P., 1925. Bailey v. State, 282 S. W. 804; Johnson v. State, 283 S. W. 807.

*348 There appears to be no merit in the criticism of the indictment. It is in the usual form charging burglary and is sufficient.

No bills of exception are found in the record save those complaining of the court’s charge. We observe no vice in the charge unless it be that it omitted some defensive issue which of course cannot be appraised without having the facts available. But we find where the court gave three special charges at appellant’s instance, all of which did prevent defensive issues, and may have been given in response to the objection urged.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Luttrell v. State
48 S.W.2d 268 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
288 S.W. 198, 105 Tex. Crim. 347, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burleson-v-state-texcrimapp-1926.