Burleson v. State

288 S.W. 198, 105 Tex. Crim. 347, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 539
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas·Decided November 10, 1926·No. No. 10393.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for burglary, punishment being two years in the penitentiary.

The statement of facts was not filed until 127 days after notice of appeal was given. No reason appears why it was not filed within the time required by the statute. It cannot be considered. Art. 760, C. C. P., 1925. Bailey v. State, 282 S. W. 804; Johnson v. State, 283 S. W. 807.

*348 There appears to be no merit in the criticism of the indictment. It is in the usual form charging burglary and is sufficient.

No bills of exception are found in the record save those complaining of the court’s charge. We observe no vice in the charge unless it be that it omitted some defensive issue which of course cannot be appraised without having the facts available. But we find where the court gave three special charges at appellant’s instance, all of which did prevent defensive issues, and may have been given in response to the objection urged.

The judgment is affirmed.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burleson v. State, 288 S.W. 198, 105 Tex. Crim. 347, 1926 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 539 (Tex. 1926).

288 S.W. 198 (Burleson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luttrell v. State
48 S.W.2d 268 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1932)