Burleson v. Hatfield
244 So. 2d 496
This text of 244 So. 2d 496 (Burleson v. Hatfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burleson v. Hatfield, 244 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
Opinion
From the briefs and record in this case, the appellant has not made reversible error clearly appear; therefore, the final judgment is affirmed. See Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co., 160 Fla. 421, 35 So.2d 392, 394 (1948).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co.
35 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
244 So. 2d 496, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burleson-v-hatfield-fladistctapp-1970.