Burleson v. Hatfield
244 So. 2d 496
Opinion
From the briefs and record in this case, the appellant has not made reversible error clearly appear; therefore, the final judgment is affirmed. See Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co., 160 Fla. 421, 35 So.2d 392, 394 (1948).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burleson v. Hatfield, 244 So. 2d 496 (Fla. Ct. App. 1970).
244 So. 2d 496 (Burleson v. Hatfield) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Topper v. Alcazar Operating Co.
35 So. 2d 392 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1948)