Burleson v. Francis
This text of 99 S.E.2d 767 (Burleson v. Francis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Pertinent Section No. 1366 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act declares that “the review by the Court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the Review Committee if supported by evidence shall be conclusive.”
In the light of this provision the finding of fact by Judge of Superior Court that the determination by the Review Committee is supported by substantial evidence is binding on this Court if there be evidence to support it. And in exceptions thereto, and to the legal conclusion reached error is not made to appear to this Court. See Lee v. Berry, 219 S.C. 382, 65 S.E. 2d 775.
Hence the judgment from which appeal is taken is
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
99 S.E.2d 767, 246 N.C. 619, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 487, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burleson-v-francis-nc-1957.