Burleson v. Francis

99 S.E.2d 767, 246 N.C. 619, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 487
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 18, 1957·No. 92·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PeR CüRiam.

Pertinent Section No. 1366 of the Agricultural Adjustment Act declares that “the review by the Court shall be limited to questions of law, and the findings of fact by the Review Committee if supported by evidence shall be conclusive.”

In the light of this provision the finding of fact by Judge of Superior Court that the determination by the Review Committee is supported by substantial evidence is binding on this Court if there be evidence to support it. And in exceptions thereto, and to the legal conclusion reached error is not made to appear to this Court. See Lee v. Berry, 219 S.C. 382, 65 S.E. 2d 775.

Hence the judgment from which appeal is taken is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burleson v. Francis, 99 S.E.2d 767, 246 N.C. 619, 1957 N.C. LEXIS 487 (N.C. 1957).

99 S.E.2d 767 (Burleson v. Francis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mason v. Renn
122 S.E.2d 792 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1961)