Burle v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burle v. State

510 S.W.3d 365, 2017 WL 491197, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 114

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 7, 2017

DocketNo. ED 104312

StatusPublished

This text of 510 S.W.3d 365 (Burle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burle v. State, 510 S.W.3d 365, 2017 WL 491197, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 114 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Erik Burle, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Proceedings and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.” We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Erik Burle, acting pro se, appeals the judgment denying his “Motion to Reopen Post-Conviction Proceedings and Request for Evidentiary Hearing.” We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

510 S.W.3d 365, 2017 WL 491197, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 114, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burle-v-state-moctapp-2017.