Burland v. Northwestern Mut. Ben. Ass'n
1 McGrath 1, 47 McGrath 424
This text of 1 McGrath 1 (Burland v. Northwestern Mut. Ben. Ass'n) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Burland v. Northwestern Mut. Ben. Ass'n, 1 McGrath 1, 47 McGrath 424 (Mich. 1898).
Opinion
Mandamus proceedings do not adjudicate rights, but are a mode of enforcing existing rights or compelling the performance of acknowledged duty. The award of mandamus concludes nothing and cannot be pleaded in bar, and its denial will not sustain error.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Bates v. Detroit Mut. Benefit Ass'n
1 McGrath 1477 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1881)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
1 McGrath 1, 47 McGrath 424, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burland-v-northwestern-mut-ben-assn-mich-1898.