Burks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Burks v. State

1910 OK CR 43, 106 P. 1133, 3 Okla. Crim. 465, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma·Decided February 3, 1910·No. No. A-69.·Published

Opinion

PEE C’UEIAM.

What, purports to be the case-made does not contain the testimony of the witnesses. The record only contains the information, the verdict of the jury, the judgment of the court, the clerk’s minutes of the trial, and some motions made by the defendant. The instructions of the court are not in the record. The information is sufficient, and the verdict and the judgment are regular. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE C’UEIAM.

What, purports to be the case-made does not contain the testimony of the witnesses. The record only contains the information, the verdict of the jury, the judgment of the court, the clerk’s minutes of the trial, and some motions made by the defendant. The instructions of the court are not in the record. The information is sufficient, and the verdict and the judgment are regular. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Burks v. State, 1910 OK CR 43, 106 P. 1133, 3 Okla. Crim. 465, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

1910 OK CR 43 (Burks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.