Burks v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Burks v. State

1910 OK CR 43, 106 P. 1133, 3 Okla. Crim. 465, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 3, 1910

DocketNo. A-69.

StatusPublished

This text of 1910 OK CR 43 (Burks v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burks v. State, 1910 OK CR 43, 106 P. 1133, 3 Okla. Crim. 465, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197 (Okla. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

PEE C’UEIAM.

What, purports to be the case-made does not contain the testimony of the witnesses. The record only contains the information, the verdict of the jury, the judgment of the court, the clerk’s minutes of the trial, and some motions made by the defendant. The instructions of the court are not in the record. The information is sufficient, and the verdict and the judgment are regular. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEE C’UEIAM.

What, purports to be the case-made does not contain the testimony of the witnesses. The record only contains the information, the verdict of the jury, the judgment of the court, the clerk’s minutes of the trial, and some motions made by the defendant. The instructions of the court are not in the record. The information is sufficient, and the verdict and the judgment are regular. The judgment of the trial court is therefore affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1910 OK CR 43, 106 P. 1133, 3 Okla. Crim. 465, 1910 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 197, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burks-v-state-oklacrimapp-1910.