Burks v. State
689 So. 2d 999, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 309, 1996 WL 675833
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burks v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 236 →
Opinion
On Return to Remand
This case was remanded in order for the trial court to assess the penalty prescribed under the Demand Reduction Assessment Act for a defendant who is convicted of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance. The court has now filed its return, which reflects that, on remand, the appellant was fined $1,000, as mandated by § 13A-12-281, Code of Alabama 1975.
Therefore, the judgement of the trial court is due to be, and it is hereby, affirmed.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burks v. State, 689 So. 2d 999, 1996 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 309, 1996 WL 675833 (Ala. Ct. App. 1996).
689 So. 2d 999 (Burks v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.