Burks v. Pate
This text of Burks v. Pate (Burks v. Pate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 05-7321
TROY LUKE BURKS,
Plaintiff - Appellant,
versus
JOHN PATE, Acting Warden; BETTY E. ALBRITTON, Disciplinary Hearing Officer; P. FELDER, Unit Sergeant; SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS,
Defendants - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CA-02-4014-3)
Submitted: April 17, 2006 Decided: April 28, 2006
Before WILLIAMS, MICHAEL, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Troy Luke Burks, Appellant Pro Se. Isaac McDuffie Stone, III, Marshall Hodges Waldron, Jr., CAROLINA LITIGATION ASSOCIATES, Bluffton, South Carolina, for Appellees.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
Troy Luke Burks appeals the district court’s order
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying
relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint. We have reviewed
the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
for the reasons stated by the district court. See Burks v. Pate,
No. CA-02-4014-3 (D.S.C. filed Aug. 8, 2005 & entered Aug. 9,
2005). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
- 2 -
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Burks v. Pate, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burks-v-pate-ca4-2006.