Burkle v. . Luce

New York Court of Appeals

Burkle v. . Luce

1 N.Y. 239

CourtNew York Court of Appeals

DecidedJanuary 5, 1848

StatusPublished

Cited by3 cases

This text of 1 N.Y. 239 (Burkle v. . Luce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkle v. . Luce, 1 N.Y. 239 (N.Y. 1848).

Pincite

Opinion

The Court

held, that the statue gives double costs to public officers on writ of error as well as in the Court of original jurisdiction. Also, that the Court did not lose jurisdiction until the remittitur should be filed in the Court below; and as that had not been done in this case, that the motion might be granted, on condition that the Attorney return the remittitur to the Clerk of this Court to be cancelled.

Rule accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The Court

held, that the statue gives double costs to public officers on writ of error as well as in the Court of original jurisdiction. Also, that the Court did not lose jurisdiction until the remittitur should be filed in the Court below; and as that had not been done in this case, that the motion might be granted, on condition that the Attorney return the remittitur to the Clerk of this Court to be cancelled.

Rule accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.Y. 239, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkle-v-luce-ny-1848.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack