Burkle v. . Luce
1 N.Y. 239
Opinion
held, that the statue gives double costs to public officers on writ of error as well as in the Court of original jurisdiction. Also, that the Court did not lose jurisdiction until the remittitur should be filed in the Court below; and as that had not been done in this case, that the motion might be granted, on condition that the Attorney return the remittitur to the Clerk of this Court to be cancelled.
Rule accordingly.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burkle v. . Luce, 1 N.Y. 239 (N.Y. 1848).
1 N.Y. 239 (Burkle v. . Luce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Shaver v. Eldred
33 N.Y.S. 158 (New York Supreme Court, 1895)
Wood v. Board of Commissioners of Excise of the Town of Randolph
9 Misc. 507 (New York Supreme Court, 1894)
Lovett v. State
29 Fla. 384 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1892)