Burkle v. Boothby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burkle v. Boothby

248 A.D. 674

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided May 15, 1936·Published

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the findings that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence and the defendant from negligence were against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the findings that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence and the defendant from negligence were against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Burkle v. Boothby, 248 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

248 A.D. 674 (Burkle v. Boothby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.