Burkle v. Boothby

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Burkle v. Boothby

248 A.D. 674

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 15, 1936

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D. 674 (Burkle v. Boothby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkle v. Boothby, 248 A.D. 674 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1936).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the findings that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence and the defendant from negligence were against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. All concur, except Taylor, J., who dissents and votes for reversal and for a new trial on the ground that the findings that the plaintiff was free from contributory negligence and the defendant from negligence were against the weight of the evidence. (The judgment awards damages for personal injuries in an automobile negligence action. The order denies motion for a new trial on the minutes.) Present — Taylor, Edgeomb, Thompson, Crosby and Lewis, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D. 674, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkle-v-boothby-nyappdiv-1936.