Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine

60 Colo. 46
Supreme Court of Colorado·Decided September 15, 1915·No. No. 8514·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per curiam.

Unless the statute so provides, a respondent cannot recover costs of a relator in a quo warranto case. Costs are distinctively a creature of statute, and where no provision is thereby made for costs none can be recovered. The common law respecting costs in quo warranto has no application with us, since we have undertaken to provide by statute under what circumstances and in what cases costs are recoverable. Finding no statute, either special or general, or a rule of court, under which costs are taxable against the relator in a quo warranto case, we are forced to the conclusion that [47] the motion for execution against the relators herein must be denied, and it is so ordered.

It appearing from the record that judgment for costs has been improvidently entered against relators, the same is hereby annulled and set aside as contrary to law and unwarranted.

Decision en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine, 60 Colo. 46 (Colo. 1915).

60 Colo. 46 (Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People ex rel. Hyatt v. Hogan
257 Ill. App. 206 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)