Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine

60 Colo. 46
CourtSupreme Court of Colorado
DecidedSeptember 15, 1915
DocketNo. 8514
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 60 Colo. 46 (Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Colorado primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkholder v. People ex rel. Nazerine, 60 Colo. 46 (Colo. 1915).

Opinion

Per curiam.

Unless the statute so provides, a respondent cannot recover costs of a relator in a quo warranto case. Costs are distinctively a creature of statute, and where no provision is thereby made for costs none can be recovered. The common law respecting costs in quo warranto has no application with us, since we have undertaken to provide by statute under what circumstances and in what cases costs are recoverable. Finding no statute, either special or general, or a rule of court, under which costs are taxable against the relator in a quo warranto case, we are forced to the conclusion that [47]*47the motion for execution against the relators herein must be denied, and it is so ordered.

It appearing from the record that judgment for costs has been improvidently entered against relators, the same is hereby annulled and set aside as contrary to law and unwarranted.

Decision en banc.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Hyatt v. Hogan
257 Ill. App. 206 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1930)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
60 Colo. 46, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkholder-v-people-ex-rel-nazerine-colo-1915.