Burkhart v. United States Department of Transportation
This text of 137 F. App'x 93 (Burkhart v. United States Department of Transportation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Garrett Burkhart petitions pro se for review of the Federal Aviation Administration’s (“FAA”) order assessing a civil penalty of $1,100 against Burkhart for leaving his seat aboard an aircraft while the Fasten Seat Belt sign was lit. We lack jurisdiction over the petition because Burkhart did not exhaust his administrative remedies. See 49 U.S.C. § 46110 (1994); 14 C.F.R. § 13.235; Reid v. Engen, 765 F.2d 1457, 1461 (9th Cir.1985) (internal citations omitted) (issues not raised before an agency tribunal cannot be raised on appeal from that tribunal).
DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
137 F. App'x 93, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkhart-v-united-states-department-of-transportation-ca9-2005.