Burkhart v. Burkhart

197 So. 730, 198 So. 21, 144 Fla. 176, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1024
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided October 4, 1940·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

*177 Per Curiam.

On petition for clarification it is ordered that our former opinion herein be modified in so far as it affirms the decree of the lower court holding defendant’s special appearance and motion to quash constituted a general appearance.

The decree appealed from is reversed in so far as it applies to the chancellor’s decree in this regard but as the court has jurisdiction of the parties as otherwise held by the chancellor the decree is in other respects affirmed.

Terrell, C. J., Whitfield, Brown, Buford and Chapman, J. J., concur. Justice Thomas not participating as authorized by Section 4687, Compiled General Laws of 1927, and Rule 21-A of the Rules of this Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burkhart v. Burkhart, 197 So. 730, 198 So. 21, 144 Fla. 176, 1940 Fla. LEXIS 1024 (Fla. 1940).

197 So. 730 (Burkhart v. Burkhart) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Griffin v. Zinn
318 So. 2d 151 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1975)
Lucian v. Southern Ohio Savings Bank & Trust Co.
23 So. 2d 674 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1945)
Tallentire v. Burkhart
14 So. 2d 395 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1943)
Kiplinger v. Kiplinger
2 So. 2d 870 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)
Burkhart v. Circuit Court of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit
1 So. 2d 872 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1941)