Burkhalter v. Webb

Court of Appeals of Texas

Burkhalter v. Webb

209 S.W. 216, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 230

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided February 13, 1919·No. No. 928.·Published

Opinion

WALTHALL, J.

In this case, appellee sued appellant on a promissory note for $500, interest, and attorney’s fees, provided in the note, and secured by chattel mortgage. The only defense made was an agreement to extend the time of payment and a small amount paid to be credited on the note.

The case was tried without jury, and judgment entered for appellee, with foreclosure of the chattel mortgage. The' court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. There is no motion for a new trial, or assignment of error appearing in the record, nor is there a brief filed by either party. No motion has been filed in this court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The case is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

WALTHALL, J.

In this case, appellee sued appellant on a promissory note for $500, interest, and attorney’s fees, provided in the note, and secured by chattel mortgage. The only defense made was an agreement to extend the time of payment and a small amount paid to be credited on the note.

The case was tried without jury, and judgment entered for appellee, with foreclosure of the chattel mortgage. The' court filed findings of fact and conclusions of law. There is no motion for a new trial, or assignment of error appearing in the record, nor is there a brief filed by either party. No motion has been filed in this court to dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

The case is affirmed.

Burkhalter v. Webb, 209 S.W. 216, 1919 Tex. App. LEXIS 230 (Tex. Ct. App. 1919).

Pincite

209 S.W. 216 (Burkhalter v. Webb) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.