Burkhalter v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

Burkhalter v. State

655 S.W.2d 208, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1097

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee

DecidedJune 29, 1983

DocketNo. 986-82

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 655 S.W.2d 208 (Burkhalter v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 208, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1097 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted murder and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for ten years. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in a published opinion delivered by the Court of [209]*209Appeals, Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi [13th] 1982).

It now appears that the decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.Cr.App.R. 304(k); Art. 44.45(b)(6) and (7), V.A.C.C.P. See Hanna v. State, 632 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI