Burkhalter v. State

655 S.W.2d 208, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1097
Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee·Decided June 29, 1983·No. No. 986-82·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

OPINION ON APPELLANT’S PETITION FOR DISCRETIONARY REVIEW

PER CURIAM.

Appellant was convicted of the offense of attempted murder and punishment was assessed at imprisonment in the Texas Department of Corrections for ten years. Appellant’s conviction was affirmed in a published opinion delivered by the Court of [209] Appeals, Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 215 (Tex.App. — Corpus Christi [13th] 1982).

It now appears that the decision to grant the appellant’s petition for discretionary review was improvident. Tex.Cr.App.R. 304(k); Art. 44.45(b)(6) and (7), V.A.C.C.P. See Hanna v. State, 632 S.W.2d 151 (Tex.Cr.App.1982).

The appellant’s petition for discretionary review is dismissed.

CLINTON and TEAGUE, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burkhalter v. State, 655 S.W.2d 208, 1983 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1097 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983).

655 S.W.2d 208 (Burkhalter v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coby Minton v. State
Texas Supreme Court, 2015
Duvall v. State
189 S.W.3d 828 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006)
Ray Anthony Duvall v. State
Court of Appeals of Texas, 2006
Weller v. State
764 S.W.2d 582 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1989)
Kimes v. State
740 S.W.2d 903 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1987)
Leal v. State
711 S.W.2d 702 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)
Solis v. State
704 S.W.2d 883 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 1986)