Burkhalter v. Partin

95 S.E. 305, 22 Ga. App. 57, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 144
CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia
DecidedMarch 14, 1918
Docket9281
StatusPublished

This text of 95 S.E. 305 (Burkhalter v. Partin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkhalter v. Partin, 95 S.E. 305, 22 Ga. App. 57, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 144 (Ga. Ct. App. 1918).

Opinion

Luke, J.

Burkhalter sued the sheriff and the surety on his bond, alleging.wilfúl refusal of the sheriff to levy a certain fi. fa. as directed by him, which resulted in -the loss of the money due on the fi. fa. A verdict was returned in favor of the defendants. A motion for a new trial was made, on the general grounds, and on the grounds that the court failed to charge fully the contention of the plaintiff, and that the jury ignored the charge of1 the court.

The charge of the court was full and fair: the evidence authorized the verdict, and for none of the reasons assigned was it error to overrule the motion for a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

Wade, C. J., and Jenkins, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
95 S.E. 305, 22 Ga. App. 57, 1918 Ga. App. LEXIS 144, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkhalter-v-partin-gactapp-1918.