Burkhalter v. Burkhalter

6 S.E.2d 299, 189 Ga. 344
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedNovember 29, 1939
Docket13109.
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 6 S.E.2d 299 (Burkhalter v. Burkhalter) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkhalter v. Burkhalter, 6 S.E.2d 299, 189 Ga. 344 (Ga. 1939).

Opinion

The single exception in this case is to the judgment holding the plaintiff in error in contempt of court for non-payment of temporary alimony duly ordered by the court. The evidence showing some earning capacity of plaintiff in error, we can not say that the judge abused his discretion.

Judgment affirmed. All the Justices concur.

No. 13109. NOVEMBER 29, 1939.
In a suit for permanent and temporary alimony brought by Dollie Burkhalter against Loy Burkhalter, an order allowing $8 per month temporary alimony and $10 attorney's fees was issued on May 13, 1939. On August 16, 1939, the plaintiff filed a petition alleging that the defendant had made no payments on the alimony so awarded, and praying that he be adjudged in contempt of court for such non-payment. On a hearing the evidence showed that the defendant had paid the plaintiff nothing as alimony; that he was employed as a truck driver hauling logs at $1.50 per day for time actually worked; that because of excessive rains he was unable to put in full time, working as little as two days per week some of the time, and that his income was not over $20 per month at any time. Judgment was rendered, holding the defendant in contempt of court. He excepted to that ruling.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Arnold v. Arnold
195 Ga. 304 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1943)
Boyett v. Boyett
15 S.E.2d 871 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Roberts v. Roberts
10 S.E.2d 62 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1940)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 S.E.2d 299, 189 Ga. 344, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkhalter-v-burkhalter-ga-1939.