Burkhalter v. Breeden

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Burkhalter v. Breeden

160 S.E. 165, 162 S.C. 64, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 170

CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina

DecidedSeptember 8, 1931

Docket13239

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 160 S.E. 165 (Burkhalter v. Breeden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkhalter v. Breeden, 160 S.E. 165, 162 S.C. 64, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 170 (S.C. 1931).

Pincite

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

The issues involved in this case are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge E. C. Dennis, who heard the cause on an agreed statement of facts. The decree, which his Honor issued, is satisfactory to this Court. The exceptions are therefore overruled, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase and Mr. Justice StabeEr and Mr. Acting Associate Justice Cosgrove: concur. Mr. Justice Cothran dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Carter.

The issues involved in this case are set forth in the decree of his Honor, Judge E. C. Dennis, who heard the cause on an agreed statement of facts. The decree, which his Honor issued, is satisfactory to this Court. The exceptions are therefore overruled, and the decree appealed from is affirmed.

Mr. Chief Justice BeEase and Mr. Justice StabeEr and Mr. Acting Associate Justice Cosgrove: concur. Mr. Justice Cothran dissents.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

160 S.E. 165, 162 S.C. 64, 1931 S.C. LEXIS 170, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkhalter-v-breeden-sc-1931.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack