Burkha Assets LLC v. Seneca Insurance Co.
This text of 2017 NY Slip Op 1825 (Burkha Assets LLC v. Seneca Insurance Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Barry R. Ostrager, J.), entered April 4, 2016, which denied plaintiff’s motion for partial summary judgment on its claim for payment under an insurance policy pursuant to an appraisal of damages due to vandalism, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
The motion court correctly determined that issues of fact exist concerning whether, notwithstanding the appraisal award, defendant was required to provide coverage in the first instance (see Matter of Delmar Box Co. [Aetna Ins. Co.], 309 NY 60 [1955]; Insurance Law § 3404).
We have considered plaintiff’s remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2017 NY Slip Op 1825, 148 A.D.3d 495, 48 N.Y.S.3d 579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkha-assets-llc-v-seneca-insurance-co-nyappdiv-2017.