Burkett v. Maxie

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Burkett v. Maxie

821 A.2d 85, 374 Md. 77, 2003 Md. LEXIS 166

Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided April 8, 2003·No. No. 103·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of April, 2003,

[78] ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed, with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Chief Judge BELL, Judge CATHELL, and Judge BATTAGLIA would not dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of April, 2003,

[78] ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed, with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Chief Judge BELL, Judge CATHELL, and Judge BATTAGLIA would not dismiss.

Burkett v. Maxie, 821 A.2d 85, 374 Md. 77, 2003 Md. LEXIS 166 (Md. 2003).

Pincite

821 A.2d 85 (Burkett v. Maxie) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.