Burkett v. Maxie

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Burkett v. Maxie

821 A.2d 85, 374 Md. 77, 2003 Md. LEXIS 166

CourtCourt of Appeals of Maryland

DecidedApril 8, 2003

DocketNo. 103

StatusPublished

This text of 821 A.2d 85 (Burkett v. Maxie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Maryland primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkett v. Maxie, 821 A.2d 85, 374 Md. 77, 2003 Md. LEXIS 166 (Md. 2003).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of April, 2003,

[78]*78ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed, with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Chief Judge BELL, Judge CATHELL, and Judge BATTAGLIA would not dismiss.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered and granted the petition for writ of certiorari in the above-captioned case, it is this 8th day of April, 2003,

[78]*78ORDERED, by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, that the writ of certiorari be, and it is hereby, dismissed, with costs, the petition having been improvidently granted.

Chief Judge BELL, Judge CATHELL, and Judge BATTAGLIA would not dismiss.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

821 A.2d 85, 374 Md. 77, 2003 Md. LEXIS 166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkett-v-maxie-md-2003.