Burkes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burkes v. State

24 S.E.2d 229, 68 Ga. App. 805, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 363

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedFebruary 4, 1943

Docket29922.

StatusPublished

This text of 24 S.E.2d 229 (Burkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkes v. State, 24 S.E.2d 229, 68 Ga. App. 805, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 363 (Ga. Ct. App. 1943).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County, of operating a lottery known as the “number game.” The judgment was rendered by the judge, sitting without a jury. The evidence, including the stipulation entered into by counsel for both parties as to the existence and operation of such a lottery in said county *806 on the date of the defendant’s arrest and as to the manner of its operation, amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Decided February 4, 1943. Bussell G. Turner, for plaintiff in error. Bond Almand, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Bur-wood T. Pye, Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted in the criminal court of Fulton County, of operating a lottery known as the “number game.” The judgment was rendered by the judge, sitting without a jury. The evidence, including the stipulation entered into by counsel for both parties as to the existence and operation of such a lottery in said county *806 on the date of the defendant’s arrest and as to the manner of its operation, amply authorized the defendant’s conviction. The overruling of the certiorari was not error for any reason assigned.

Decided February 4, 1943. Bussell G. Turner, for plaintiff in error. Bond Almand, solicitor, John A. Boykin, solicitor-general, Bur-wood T. Pye, Bindley W. Gamp, solicitor, contra.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Gardner, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 S.E.2d 229, 68 Ga. App. 805, 1943 Ga. App. LEXIS 363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkes-v-state-gactapp-1943.