Burkes v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Burkes v. State

175 S.E. 412, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 386

CourtCourt of Appeals of Georgia

DecidedJuly 9, 1934

Docket24051

StatusPublished

This text of 175 S.E. 412 (Burkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burkes v. State, 175 S.E. 412, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 386 (Ga. Ct. App. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of possessing whisky. The evidence connecting him with that offense, while circumstantial, was sufficient', in connection with the direct evidence as to an incriminatory admission made by him, to authorize the verdict. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. R. L. Addition, Charles G. Bruce, for plaintiff in error. Chester A. Byars, solicitor, contra.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Broyles, C. J.

The accused was convicted of possessing whisky. The evidence connecting him with that offense, while circumstantial, was sufficient', in connection with the direct evidence as to an incriminatory admission made by him, to authorize the verdict. The refusal to grant a new trial was not error.

Judgment affirmed.

MacIntyre and Guerry, JJ., concur. R. L. Addition, Charles G. Bruce, for plaintiff in error. Chester A. Byars, solicitor, contra.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

175 S.E. 412, 49 Ga. App. 322, 1934 Ga. App. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkes-v-state-gactapp-1934.