Burkes v. State

815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 10, 2002·No. No. 2D02-972·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Kevin G. Burkes appeals the orders summarily denying his motion for postcon-viction relief and his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). The trial court denied the rule 3.850 motion as untimely. Although it appears that Burkes’ motion was timely, see Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990), and Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992), we nonetheless affirm the trial court’s order because Burkes’ claims are either proeedurally barred or otherwise without merit. We affirm the denial of the rule 3.800(a) motion without comment.

Affirmed.

FULMER and GREEN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burkes v. State, 815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

815 So. 2d 777 (Burkes v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McClain v. Crawford
815 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)