Burkes v. State

815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 10, 2002
DocketNo. 2D02-972
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 815 So. 2d 777 (Burkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burkes v. State, 815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

Kevin G. Burkes appeals the orders summarily denying his motion for postcon-viction relief and his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). The trial court denied the rule 3.850 motion as untimely. Although it appears that Burkes’ motion was timely, see Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990), and Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992), we nonetheless affirm the trial court’s order because Burkes’ claims are either proeedurally barred or otherwise without merit. We affirm the denial of the rule 3.800(a) motion without comment.

Affirmed.

FULMER and GREEN, JJ„ Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McClain v. Crawford
815 So. 2d 777 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkes-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.