Burkes v. State
This text of 815 So. 2d 777 (Burkes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Kevin G. Burkes appeals the orders summarily denying his motion for postcon-viction relief and his motion to correct an illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure 3.850 and 3.800(a). The trial court denied the rule 3.850 motion as untimely. Although it appears that Burkes’ motion was timely, see Huff v. State, 569 So.2d 1247 (Fla.1990), and Haag v. State, 591 So.2d 614 (Fla.1992), we nonetheless affirm the trial court’s order because Burkes’ claims are either proeedurally barred or otherwise without merit. We affirm the denial of the rule 3.800(a) motion without comment.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
815 So. 2d 777, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 6378, 2002 WL 952355, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burkes-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.