Burke v. Wuster
This text of 135 A.D.2d 598 (Burke v. Wuster) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— In an action for specific performance of a contract to convey title to property, the defendant appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (McCarthy, J.), entered September 4, 1986, as denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
[599]*599Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Whether the defendant’s motion be viewed as one pursuant to CPLR 3211 or 3212, dismissal of the complaint was properly denied. The propriety of the defendant’s rescission of the contract raises issues which should be determined at trial. Mangano, J. P., Brown, Lawrence, Weinstein and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
135 A.D.2d 598, 522 N.Y.S.2d 465, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52539, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-wuster-nyappdiv-1987.