Burke v. Steffen

231 P.3d 164, 168 Wash. 2d 1020
Washington Supreme Court·Decided March 30, 2010·No. 83889-5·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

231 P.3d 164 (2010)
168 Wash.2d 1020

Gerald BURKE and Ethelda Burke, husband and wife, Petitioners,
v.
Peter STEFFEN and "Jane Doe" Steffen, husband and wife, and America's Best Charters, LLC, d/b/a ABC Yacht Sales, Respondents.

No. 83889-5.

Supreme Court of Washington.

March 30, 2010.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed Chief Justice Madsen and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, considered at its March 30, 2010, Motion Calendar, whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied and the Respondent's request for attorney fees is granted. The Respondent is awarded reasonable attorney fees and expenses pursuant to RAP 18.1(j). The amount of the attorney fees and expenses will be determined by the Supreme Court Clerk pursuant to RAP 18.1. Pursuant to RAP 18.1(d), Respondent *165 should file an affidavit with the Clerk of the Washington State Supreme Court.

For the Court

/s/ Madsen, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Steffen, 231 P.3d 164, 168 Wash. 2d 1020 (Wash. 2010).

231 P.3d 164 (Burke v. Steffen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Durand v. HIMC CORPORATION
231 P.3d 164 (Washington Supreme Court, 2010)