Burke v. State
Opinion
Filed 2/20/02 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2002 ND 19
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Douglas Eric Guy, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20010136
Appeal from the District Court of Cass County, East Central Judicial District, the Honorable Cynthia A. Rothe-Seeger, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Birch P. Burdick, State’s Attorney, Courthouse, P.O. Box 2806, Fargo, N.D. 58108-2806, for plaintiff and appellee.
Richard E. Edinger, P.O. Box 1295, Fargo, N.D. 58107-1295, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Guy
No. 20010136
Per Curiam.
[¶1] We grant the State’s motion at oral argument to withdraw the material in its appendix, which appeared in violation of N.D.R.App.P. 30(a).
[¶2] We summarily affirm the East Central Judicial District Court’s judgment of conviction of Douglas Eric Guy for gross sexual imposition, burglary, robbery, and felonious restraint, under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(4) and (7). See, e.g. , State v. Lewis , 291 N.W.2d 735, 737 (N.D. 1980) (declining to adopt the procedures outlined in Anders v. California , 386 U.S. 738 (1967)).
[¶3] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2002 ND 18 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.