Burke v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burke v. State

539 S.W.3d 81

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 5, 2017·No. WD 80243·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Burke v. State, 539 S.W.3d 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

539 S.W.3d 81 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.