Burke v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burke v. State

539 S.W.3d 81

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 5, 2017

DocketWD 80243

StatusPublished

This text of 539 S.W.3d 81 (Burke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. State, 539 S.W.3d 81 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. David R. Burke appeals from the Judgment of the Circuit Court of Clay County, Missouri, denying his Rule 29.15 amended motion for post-conviction relief, based on ineffective assistance of counsel, after an evidentiary hearing. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

539 S.W.3d 81, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-state-moctapp-2017.