Burke v. State

52 Ind. 461
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedMay 15, 1876
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 Ind. 461 (Burke v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Burke v. State, 52 Ind. 461 (Ind. 1876).

Opinion

Pettit, J.

Indictment for selling liquor in violation of the last clause of section 1 of the act of March 17th, 1875, to regulate and license the sale of spiritous liquors, etc., Acts of Special Session of 1875, p. 55, which reads thus:

“ Nor shall any person, without having first procured-such license, sell or barter any intoxicating liquor to be drank, or suffered to be drank in his house, out-house, yard, garden, or the appurtenances thereto belonging.”

The indictment does not allege that the defendant had no license to sell liquor to be drank in the places named in the statute, nor that the liquor was sold to be drank in any of the places named in the statute, but it says:

“ The said Burke not then and there having a license to sell intoxicating liquor to be drank on the premises;” not his premises or the premises where the liquor was sold, or any of the places named in the law. The indictment does [462]*462not make a case under the law, and the motion to quash, should have been sustained.

The judgment is reversed, with instructions to sustain the motion to quash the indictment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schilling v. State
18 N.E. 682 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1888)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 Ind. 461, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-state-ind-1876.