Burke v. State
745 So. 2d 1074, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15139, 1999 WL 1036637
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burke v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 732 So. 2d 1194 →
Opinion
Because the defendant withdrew his request to discharge court-appointed counsel, the trial court was not required to continue its Nelson inquiry.1 See Lowe v. State, 650 So.2d 969, 975 (Fla.1994), cert. denied, 516 U.S. 887, 116 S.Ct. 230, 133 L.Ed.2d 159 (1995). Accordingly, we affirm the defendant’s convictions and sentences.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burke v. State, 745 So. 2d 1074, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 15139, 1999 WL 1036637 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
745 So. 2d 1074 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Nelson v. State
274 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1973)
Jones v. Love
516 U.S. 888 (Supreme Court, 1995)