Burke v. State
404 So. 2d 827, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burke v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 456 So. 2d 1245 →
Opinion
Under Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (Fla.1981), we are powerless to accept the appellant’s position that, while the testimony introduced below supports the finding of his guilt, it is so inherently incredible and contrary to the weight of the evidence as to require a new trial “in the interest of justice.”
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burke v. State, 404 So. 2d 827, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 21339 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).
404 So. 2d 827 (Burke v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tibbs v. State
397 So. 2d 1120 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)