Burke v. Snyder

904 So. 2d 654, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066, 2005 WL 1522753
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Burke v. Snyder. Read the opinion of the Court — 899 So. 2d 336
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 29, 2005·No. No. 4D03-4976·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Susan Burke, challenges the dismissal of her fourth amended complaint filed against Dr. Arthur Snyder for injuries she allegedly sustained during a medical examination. The trial court entered the order of dismissal because Burke failed to attend a case management hearing. Because the trial court did not make explicit findings in the order of dismissal of willful noncompliance or deliberate disregard of the order to attend the case management hearing, we must reverse and remand for further proceedings. The cases uniformly hold that an order imposing the severe sanction of dismissal of an action for failure to attend a pre-trial conference must contain explicit findings, supported by the record, that the party failing to attend the hearing did so in willful, intentional or deliberate disregard of the order setting the hearing. See Adlington v. Fla. Parole Comm’n, 824 So.2d 256 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002), and cases cited therein. Here, the order only stated that the ease was dismissed because Burke did not appear at the hearing despite all parties having been noticed.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand for further proceedings. We have not reached the merits of the dismissal.

Reversed and remanded.

STEVENSON, TAYLOR and HAZOURI, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Snyder, 904 So. 2d 654, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 10066, 2005 WL 1522753 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

904 So. 2d 654 (Burke v. Snyder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Adlington v. FLORIDA PAROLE COM'N
824 So. 2d 256 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)