Burke v. Oregon
279 U.S. 811, 49 S. Ct. 262
Opinion
The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, for the reason that the federal question presented is frivolous, on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toup v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Quong Ham Wah v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U. S. 445, 449.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Burke v. Oregon, 279 U.S. 811, 49 S. Ct. 262 (1929).
279 U.S. 811 (Burke v. Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Willis v. Tennessee
296 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 1935)