Burke v. Oregon

279 U.S. 811, 49 S. Ct. 262
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 5, 1929·No. No. 572·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per. Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of jurisdiction, for the reason that the federal question presented is frivolous, on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toup v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Quong Ham Wah v. Industrial Comm’n, 255 U. S. 445, 449.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Oregon, 279 U.S. 811, 49 S. Ct. 262 (1929).

279 U.S. 811 (Burke v. Oregon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Willis v. Tennessee
296 U.S. 533 (Supreme Court, 1935)