Burke v. Metropolitan Dade County

706 So. 2d 1379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2296, 1998 WL 103752
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 11, 1998·No. No. 97-3024·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Because intent in a civil theft action is not a matter to be determined by the trial court on summary judgment, but rather, by the trier of fact, American Int’l Realty v. Southeast First Nat’l Bank of Miami, 468 So.2d 383, 385 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985), the circuit court order is quashed, and the cause is reversed and remanded to the trial court. However, on remand, Metropolitan Dade County is granted leave to amend its complaint to add a count for unjust enrichment.

Petition granted; order quashed; reversed and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Metropolitan Dade County, 706 So. 2d 1379, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 2296, 1998 WL 103752 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

706 So. 2d 1379 (Burke v. Metropolitan Dade County) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

MHI, Inc. v. DeCamp Realty, Inc.
726 So. 2d 305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)