Burke v. McHenry

Missouri Court of Appeals

Burke v. McHenry

552 S.W.3d 590

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMarch 13, 2018

DocketWD 80589

StatusPublished

This text of 552 S.W.3d 590 (Burke v. McHenry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Burke v. McHenry, 552 S.W.3d 590 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

Mr. Tom Burke appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri, quieting title to certain real estate in favor of Respondents Carmen and Jacob McHenry. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Burke argues that the circuit court erred in quieting title to the real estate in favor of the McHenrys because the judgment is against the weight of the evidence and incorrectly applies the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

Mr. Tom Burke appeals from the judgment of the Circuit Court of Platte County, Missouri, quieting title to certain real estate in favor of Respondents Carmen and Jacob McHenry. In his sole point on appeal, Mr. Burke argues that the circuit court erred in quieting title to the real estate in favor of the McHenrys because the judgment is against the weight of the evidence and incorrectly applies the law. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, a memorandum of law has been provided to the parties. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

552 S.W.3d 590, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/burke-v-mchenry-moctapp-2018.