Home/Supreme Court of Georgia/Burke v. Ledsinger

Burke v. Ledsinger

41 S.E. 682, 115 Ga. 195, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 344
Supreme Court of Georgia·Decided April 3, 1902·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

Cobb, J.

The case presented by the present record is substantially the same as that contained in the record when this controversy was here before, and is controlled by the rulings then made. Ledsinger v. Burke, 113 Ga. 74. The portions of the charge excepted to were not erroneous for any reason assigned ; the charge, when taken as a whole, fairly submitted to the jury the issues involved, in accordance with the principles heretofore laid down in this case; the evidence authorized the verdict, and the court did not- err in refusing to grant a new trial.

Judgment affirmed.

All the Justices concurring, except Little and Lewis, JJ., absent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Burke v. Ledsinger, 41 S.E. 682, 115 Ga. 195, 1902 Ga. LEXIS 344 (Ga. 1902).

41 S.E. 682 (Burke v. Ledsinger) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance v. First National Bank & Trust Co.
110 S.E.2d 782 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1959)
Doyle v. United Finance Co.
102 S.E.2d 637 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1958)
Blackwell v. Southland Butane Gas Co.
97 S.E.2d 191 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1957)
Rivers v. Brown
36 S.E.2d 429 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1945)
Smoot v. Alexander
16 S.E.2d 544 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1941)
Los Angeles v. Los Angeles Etc. Co.
93 P. 1006 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
City of L.A. v. L.A. Indep. Gas Co.
152 Cal. 765 (California Supreme Court, 1908)
Rucker v. Tabor
56 S.E. 124 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1906)